Oanda vs LQDFX Comparison (2023)

Published :
Updated :
Written by

Oanda vs LQDFX: In a Nutshell

Oanda

Founded by Drs. Stumm and Olsen in the USA in 1996, Oanda is one of the oldest and most experienced forex brokers in the world. The broker expanded into Asia in 2007, opened its London office in 2011, and its Sydney office in 2014. On its platforms, you can trade over 3000 forex, CFDs, and even real stocks.

Risk warning: 71% of retail investor accounts lose money.

LQDFX

Established in 2015, LQDFX boasts of low spreads, fast order executions, and security through client funds segregation, zero balance implementation, etc. Newbies are encouraged with multiple trading resources, demo account contests, and even micro accounts. Investors can choose the MAM/PAMM accounts and pros can open VIP accounts.

LQDFX Overview
  • Founded In: 2015
  • Minimum Deposit: $20
  • Maximum Leverage: 1:300
  • Regulations: None 
  • Trading platform: MT4
  • Account Types: VIP Account, ECN , Gold, Micro, Islamic
  • Payment Options: (5+) VISA MASTER
  • US Traders: Accepted 

           

Oanda vs LQDFX: Pros and Cons

Oanda Pros & Cons

Pros
  • Regulated by the CySEC, FCA, CFTC, JFSA, IIROC, ASIC, MAS and FSC BVI
  • Clients can trade over 1800 forex/CFDs and over 2000 real stocks.
  • Platforms: MT4, MT5, and Oanda mobile apps on iOS and Android.
  • Trading tools provided are MetaTrader premium tools, Autochartist, Market pulse analysis, etc.
  • Customer support is provided in multiple languages and via different channels.
  • Fast and user-friendly account opening
  • The TradingView platform is available, alongside several VPS services for MT4 hosting.
Cons
  • Bank withdrawals incur a fee which is transferred to the trader.
  • Premium core accounts require a minimum balance of $20,000
  • Inactivity fees are charged from dormant accounts.
  • No account protection for U.S. clients
  • No guaranteed stop-losses for U.S. or U.K. clients
  • Traders in the U.S. cannot access single-stock CFDs
  • No cent accounts, bonus programme for beginner traders

LQDFX Pros & Cons

Pros
  • ECN broker with spreads from 0.0 pips and full STP execution.
  • The minimum deposit required to start live trading is $20.
  • Zero-balance protection and segregated funds.
  • A 100% deposit bonus is given to traders who deposit from $250 to $20,000.
  • Variety of Account Types including Swap Free Islamic Account 
  • Training resources in the form of video lessons, eBooks, etc.
  • More than 30 video lessons are provided to train beginner traders.
  • Accept multiple deposit methods such as debit/credit cards, cryptos, bank transfers, and PayRedeem eCards.
  • An Economic Calendar, trading calculators, and chart analysis are some of the trading tools provided by the broker.
Cons
  • No regulation from any regulatory authority.
  • MT4 is the only platform available for traders.
  • VIP accounts have a very high opening deposit.
  • No daily market news and analysis. 
  • No MAM Managed Account 
  • Withdrawal fees for Visa and MasterCard

Oanda vs LQDFX: Side-by-Side Comparison

Oanda
LQDFX
Product
Product
Oanda
LQDFX
Founded In
Founded In
1996
2015
Founded By
Founded By
Dr. Michael Stumm & Dr. Richard Olsen
Not Found
Headquarters
Headquarters
New York, New York, United States
Gros-Isle, Saint Lucia
Regulations
Regulations
ASIC, CFTC, IIROC, FCA, PFSA, MAS in Singapore, FSA in Japan, FSC in BVI
None
Min Deposit
Min Deposit
None
$20
Max Leverage
Max Leverage
1:50 (US), 1:30 (EU), 1:200 (other regions)
1:300
Tradable Assets
Tradable Assets
Forex, Indices , Metals , Shares, Commodities, Cryptocurrencies
FX, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Cryptos
Fees
Fees
Spread starting from 0.2 pips or commission $5
Spread from 0.7 pips
Platforms and Tools
Platforms and Tools
MT4, MT5, fxTrade app
MT4
US Traders
US Traders
Allowed
Allowed

Oanda Vs LQDFX: Our Scores and Ratings

We rated both brokers, Oanda and LQDFX, on a scale of 1 to 10, with 0.1 increments. To achieve a comprehensive rating, we broadly grouped all services offered by brokers into 6 macro categories and assigned percentage weights to them. Each macro category is subdivided into several data points which contributes to the total score of 1.0-10.0 assigned to each macro category. Since all categories are not equally important, our weight percentage plays a significant role in assessing the broker accurately. For example, Regulation and Security contributes a total weight of 40% to the whole ratings because this is the most important rating category. To learn more, read our methodology.

Oanda :

8.8
Total Score
Regulation and Security (40%)10
Fees and Commissions (20%)7
Trading (15%)8
Trading tools (10%)9
Customer Support (10%)9.2
Trading Education (5%)7

LQDFX

4.2
LQDFX Scores
Regulation and Security (40%)1.5
Fees and Commissions (20%)7
Trading (15%)6
Trading tools (10%)2
Customer Support (10%)8
Trading Education (5%)6

Final Verdict :

Written by

Jason Paine is a forex trader, researcher, and tech enthusiast. He is passionate about financial markets and cutting-edge technology. With a dynamic 16-year trading career, he's on a mission to guide fellow traders. Having navigated diverse forex brokers, Jason shares his insights at Brokersway to bridge the gap between traders and the right brokerage.

Disclosure:  At Brokersway we're committed to delivering unbiased information. our opinions are our own and are not influenced by the payment we receive from our advertising partners. While we adhere to strict editorial integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners. Here's an explanation of how we make money.

Leave a Comment