FBS vs LQDFX Comparison (2023)

Published :
Updated :
Written by

FBS vs LQDFX: In a Nutshell

FBS

Established in 2009, FBS has matured into a leading forex and CFD broker in Europe and indeed a global brand. It boasts of about 17 million clients and over 60 prestigious awards for excellent services. FBS.eu offers low spreads and split-second executions without requotes; courtesy of its deep liquidity pool.

Risk warning: 73.21% of retail CFD accounts lose money.

FBS Overview
  • Founded In: 2009
  • Minimum Deposit: $5
  • Maximum Leverage: 1:3000
  • Regulations: FSC(Belize) 
  • Trading platform: MT4, MT5, Webtrader
  • Account Types: Standard, Cent, Pro
  • Payment Options: VISA, MasterCard, Local Exchangers, Neteller, PerfectMoney, Skrill, SticPay
  • US Traders: Not Accept

LQDFX

Established in 2015, LQDFX boasts of low spreads, fast order executions, and security through client funds segregation, zero balance implementation, etc. Newbies are encouraged with multiple trading resources, demo account contests, and even micro accounts. Investors can choose the MAM/PAMM accounts and pros can open VIP accounts.

LQDFX Overview
  • Founded In: 2015
  • Minimum Deposit: $20
  • Maximum Leverage: 1:300
  • Regulations: None 
  • Trading platform: MT4
  • Account Types: VIP Account, ECN , Gold, Micro, Islamic
  • Payment Options: (5+) VISA MASTER
  • US Traders: Accepted 

           

FBS vs LQDFX: Pros and Cons

FBS Pros & Cons

Pros
  • Regulated by the CySEC, ASIC, FSCA South Africa, and FSC Belize.
  • The Maximum Leverage is as high as 1:3000
  • The Minimum deposit is $5 
  • Trading is on the MT4, MT5, and FBS trader platforms.
  • There is an account type to suit newbies, experienced, and pro traders.
  • Low spreads, high leverage, and fast order executions
  • Easy and fast account opening
  • Forex Guidebook, Forex Intensive, trading ideas, webinars, and other training resources are provided.
Cons
  • Tradable assets are not much, especially when compared to other top brokers.
  • Daily Market news and analysis on FBS.eu are not regularly updated.
  • No premium trading tools to assist traders.
  • No investor protection for non-EU Clients 
  • Managed Accounts & Social Trading is unavailable 
  • Few Account Base Currencies

LQDFX Pros & Cons

Pros
  • ECN broker with spreads from 0.0 pips and full STP execution.
  • The minimum deposit required to start live trading is $20.
  • Zero-balance protection and segregated funds.
  • A 100% deposit bonus is given to traders who deposit from $250 to $20,000.
  • Variety of Account Types including Swap Free Islamic Account 
  • Training resources in the form of video lessons, eBooks, etc.
  • More than 30 video lessons are provided to train beginner traders.
  • Accept multiple deposit methods such as debit/credit cards, cryptos, bank transfers, and PayRedeem eCards.
  • An Economic Calendar, trading calculators, and chart analysis are some of the trading tools provided by the broker.
Cons
  • No regulation from any regulatory authority.
  • MT4 is the only platform available for traders.
  • VIP accounts have a very high opening deposit.
  • No daily market news and analysis. 
  • No MAM Managed Account 
  • Withdrawal fees for Visa and MasterCard

FBS vs LQDFX: Side-by-Side Comparison

FBS
LQDFX
Product
Product
Founded In
Founded In
2009
2015
Founded By
Founded By
Aaron Johnson
Not Found
Headquarters
Headquarters
Belize city, Belize
Gros-Isle, Saint Lucia
Regulations
Regulations
FSC(Belize)
None
Min Deposit
Min Deposit
$5
$20
Max Leverage
Max Leverage
1:3000
1:300
Tradable Assets
Tradable Assets
Forex , Stock ,Indices , Crypto , Metals , Energies , Forex Exotic
FX, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Cryptos
Fees
Fees
Spread from 0.7 pips
Spread from 0.7 pips
Platforms and Tools
Platforms and Tools
MT4, MT5, Webtrader
MT4
US Traders
US Traders
Not Allowed
Allowed

FBS Vs LQDFX: Our Scores and Ratings

We rated both brokers, FBS and LQDFX, on a scale of 1 to 10, with 0.1 increments. To achieve a comprehensive rating, we broadly grouped all services offered by brokers into 6 macro categories and assigned percentage weights to them. Each macro category is subdivided into several data points which contributes to the total score of 1.0-10.0 assigned to each macro category. Since all categories are not equally important, our weight percentage plays a significant role in assessing the broker accurately. For example, Regulation and Security contributes a total weight of 40% to the whole ratings because this is the most important rating category. To learn more, read our methodology.

FBS :

8.8
Total Score
Regulation and Security (40%)9.6
Fees and Commissions (20%)9.4
Trading (15%)8
Trading tools (10%)5
Customer Support (10%)9.5
Trading Education (5%)9.5

LQDFX

4.2
LQDFX Scores
Regulation and Security (40%)1.5
Fees and Commissions (20%)7
Trading (15%)6
Trading tools (10%)2
Customer Support (10%)8
Trading Education (5%)6

Final Verdict :

Written by

Jason Paine is a forex trader, researcher, and tech enthusiast. He is passionate about financial markets and cutting-edge technology. With a dynamic 16-year trading career, he's on a mission to guide fellow traders. Having navigated diverse forex brokers, Jason shares his insights at Brokersway to bridge the gap between traders and the right brokerage.

DisclosureAt Brokersway we're committed to delivering unbiased information. our opinions are our own and are not influenced by the payment we receive from our advertising partners. While we adhere to strict editorial integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners. Here's an explanation of how we make money.

Leave a Comment